Leaked Bilderberg Closing Remarks – 2014

bilderberg2EXCLUSIVE SCOOP: the top secret classified report of the last meeting of Bilderberg … “

Although it’s quite possible this Bilderberg speech is a clever fraud, there is certainly enough truth buried within it to warrant sharing this diabolical mindset. It exposes a misunderstood motivation, that it is not the end-goal of obscene wealth that the elite pursue, but the end-goal of technological immortality and world domination.

Could this just be a clever way to hide real intentions in the public domain?

Apparently, this is not a very good translation from the French, but it certainly does not hinder our understanding!

From: http://www.lecontrarien.com/ (translated below)

 

Record account of annual meeting. Classified Top Secret. For exclusive use of members.

Closing Remarks by the Chairman of the meeting.

Beyond capitalism. Crossing the new frontier.

If we continue to maintain control of the masses by the classical wage labor within a framework of a system built on mass production and mass consumption with the solvency of the consumers by allocating a portion of the wealth created via work, we all have now acquired the certainty that the long-term survival of the human species, the backup and the sustainability of a viable biosphere and in harmony with the human activities required a total reorganization of our modes of thought, organization and production.

As we all know, in fact the goal we are pursuing is neither totally vain accumulation of new wealth or even the rescue of an economic system, it was used for more than three centuries and become incompatible with our vision of the future.

The objective which we pursue is obviously the one of the eternal life, or in any case the passage to the man living two centuries and we join here the ambitious ideas of transhumanism which we wish to develop, to install to favor the emergence of a new human being. Of a superman. As well as our technologies allow us from now on to possess said tools of “augmented reality”, our researches perfectly succeeded as regards “the increased man”. Our technologies are perfectly developed. We are ready to live two centuries. Our nanotechnologies allow us to repair the bodies of the inside, the decoding of the human genome allowed us to understand the functioning of the cellular aging which we are not capable of stopping, but of slowing down considerably. Our control of stem cells allows us to re-make at the demand any cellular tissue or still obviously any organ which would become failing.

Finally, our control of the human genome allows us as well to select the most effective and most adapted genetic heritages, without forgetting the fact that by modifying some we can finally increase our physical as well mental abilities.

Our illustrious predecessors of the 30s thought naively that we could transpose, for the improvement of the human race, the methods used for the optimization of dog breeds by crossings skilfully organized. Nevertheless, these failures of the “Nazism” allowed us to explore new ways and to reach the success which we celebrate today. We finally uncovered the secrets of the eternal life, the ultimate conquest of the man become finally his own god and his own master. We are all, us here gathered, Alpha and Omega of this New World which opens to us and which it is thus advisable to us to shape.

Obviously, as you know, it raises absolutely colossal problems of implementation and it was all the challenge in the works of the various committees in which you participated throughout these intense days of seminar.

We have all an acute consciousness of the fact that the planet and our environment cannot obviously support the eternal life of tens of billion human beings who would consume in the same way as today. We know all that an infinite growth, including demographics in a finite world is an intellectual aberration. We all understood that to divide the world into two castes, that of the mortal and the immortal, would simply be impossible because in one case we suggest to live and to the others to die, so putting working and mainstream masses in a situation where they would have nothing to lose any more, except I remind to you that the main tool of the control of the peoples passes by the fact of granting benefits calculated allowing to give the illusion of a loss in case of rebellion.

The whole of these fact returns the deployment of the technologies of immortality and improvement of the man simply impossible for the moment.

The working groups have therefore submitted a number of proposals that were discussed by the full committee. I’ll just cite the most important measures that were passed unanimously in accordance with our privacy practices of our Grand Masters. It will be up to apply and implement each in your respective country and geographical area of influence, the following decisions.

The initial objective is the massive depopulation in protecting at best the environment, which is tantamount to exclude from the fields of our possible use of any nuclear weapons which would be tantamount to inflicting some irreparable damage to our so small planet. which is to exclude from the scope of our possible use of any nuclear weapons that would inflict some irreparable damage to our planet so small. The resources that we have are few in number, but their cumulative efficiency is certain since in returning to resonance we will get what the military call a “multiplier effect of force”. It is the triptych. economic collapse, civil war and massive epidemics. The use of these three tools should allow us to eventually reduce the world population from 7-10 billion inhabitants. We think that to reach our objective of 500 million human beings alive is illusory and that in spite of all our efforts of reduction, pockets of survivors will remain almost everywhere throughout the planet. Nevertheless, these pockets should not raise us of major problems, at least at first because of their disorganization, their isolation and their incapacity to master all the techniques if only current because of their weak number should limit considerably their power of nuisance. We think that in some years many will disappear and that little who will remain will return more or less quickly to the wild in a few generations. Any group that threatens us is, in all cases, treated quickly.

Our main historic enemy to the implementation of our plan was obviously the national states. Globalization, globalization, European institutions, mass immigration were so many tools that we have used with great success for 30 years and now national identities and feelings of belonging were significantly reduced, as patriotic feelings. Money and ownership have become the core values ​​of many. The politicization of the masses has been significantly reduced, nations as we hoped, become fragile and can now be destabilized from within.

We thus have to pursue with constancy the immigration policy allowing to make considerable masses of poor people come from the South into impoverished countries of the NorthWe have to with constancy make rise the most radical Islam to instigate at the most the hatreds and the dissension in the peoples. When we will bring economic collapse,then the most absurd that we have developed in each country lead most of these countries to large-scale civil wars where each community will be responsible for us to kill the largest number communitarianism members of the other community. When we shall provoke the economic collapse, then the most absurd communitarianism which we have developed in every country will conduct the largest part of these countries towards large-scale civil wars where every community will take charge for our account to kill the largest number of the members of the opposite community.

Blacks against whites in the USA, Muslim against Christians in Europe, these civil wars will have the immense advantage to destroy the people without confrontations between degenerate countries into nuclear power world war . Finally, when the wars will destroy countries, we shall take advantage of it to amplify the distribution of viruses such as our project of e-bola 2.0 modified genetically which we test at present with efficiency because we obtain invaluable epidemiological, sociological data (behavior of the individuals in front of the disease) but we also visualize our capacity to saturate systems of care which will be already considerably degraded, in every case, by the civil wars which we shall have created on the example of the war between the two Ukraines.

All these elements, lack of preparation of the peoples, their dependence towards all the support systems will make them particularly vulnerable to our various actions. The economic collapse should quickly propagate to the whole planet. China will collapse under the weight of social unrests and Russia, which still raises us problems at the moment, should see its problem settled in 2015 as we hope for it, but lets say that for the moment it is the Russian-Chinese axis which sets the biggest resistance against our vision of future. We do not exclude, if we did not manage to convince, to use the weapon of the assassination targeted towards personalities refusing our program of depopulation and the support to our ideology of the eternal life.

Obviously, for all those who would not have understood it, what you have just read has no relationship with the reality and any resemblance with one or several existing characters would be purely coincidental (or not….). It is of course about science fiction (or not completely….). It was just the short story, taken out of my fertile mind (or elsewhere…), which I wanted to tell you. You can of course fall to sleep again quietly.

Let us say that it is just about the starting point of the fact that could be a novel (or not…..) but the fact remains that, like as any story, it raises real questions.

The eternal life, which is at the heart of the strategy of a company as Google (among which the links with the most secret authorities of the USA as the NSA or CIA are clearly demonstrated), asks the question of the possibility of the accessibility of all to the eternal life. Can we be 10, 20 or 30 billion human beings to populate the planet and to consume? The answer is naturally negative, then in such a necessarily hypothetical case, than would we make men and women too? Read here an excellent article of the JDD on the Laurent Alexandre’s last book ” the death of the death ” detailing the strategy of Google.

The transhumanism is not a fancy of the mind, it is even an ideology fundamentally profoundly disgusting that always existed even if it bore other names in other times. The transhumanism develops even in a relatively transparent way with almost bare face and finally, nobody finds so much anything wrong there, but that will there be a man when the man will scientifically be improved to become a superman, and does not it still remind you anything?

Other question, we begin finally to speak a little about the devastation that is going to cause the arrival of robotics, and France too even dedicated a report on this matter on the JT (TV NEWS) of 20 hours of yesterday on this study which announces the disappearance of 3 million jobs in France before 2025 – but I can assure you that it will be much more and much more fast – and which gives us fast a reason for hope by going to show us a company of aeronautics which even started work at the same time as it installed……. a robot!

All this brings us to two thorough questions. The first one it is that factually, by eliminating all the jobs and the working maximum to optimize the earnings, companies finally get out quite a shot in the forward foot because obviously, there will not be a solvent consumer anymore and thus of profit, then why to pursue this policy, wherever from the idea in reality the system does not try to save itself but “to surpass itself” and, from now on, the border of division between the rich and the poor people is not so much the money than the access to the eternal life.

Other big question, corollary of the first elements, you can see that the man sees his “marginal utility” collapsing. Mao said that a man was a mouth to be nourished but two arms (to work). Simple but justified economic calculation. The man with the two arms it is a “working strength”. Moreover, all our economy is based on this type of postulate. Nevertheless we see well that the man becomes useless and will become especially even more as the new machines which arrive will allow to make everything, or almost, without human intervention. The humanoids can replace us for 95 % of the tasks, while what will remain to the man?

If I want to believe in the ability of humanity to share and exceed all its faults, let us be reasonable, human history proves that there is little chance that we live in a world of Carebears where everyone would be nice and nobody would lack anything … So what about all those arms becoming too perfectly useless, I would say obsolete. How to solve the problem we could say modestly.

If we take the arguments after “environmentalists” and “transhumanists”, it seems only logical that a drastic depopulation policy would overcome the problems we face and these arguments, as odious as they are, are intellectually unstoppable. We have become too numerous, the planet can not sustain the current number of people in the current economic system, our ecological footprint is unbearable and we no longer have any need of labor. Finally, we could almost live forever, or the quest for eternity is obviously a human temptation since the dawn of time.

So of course, all this is the pure fiction…. and yet … If Mao said that a mouth to feed it was two useful arms, today he would say a mouth, it is always a mouth of excess, especially when there are 7 billions and when the arms, soon, will not be of no use any more. And Mao, the great humanist, what would he have done in such a context?

It is already too late. Get ready and stay tuned in.

Till tomorrow … if you would not mind !!

Charles SANNAT

 

 

What is the Bilderberg Club?

DAILY MIRROR

  • The Bilderberg Group, Bilderberg conference, Bilderberg meetings or Bilderberg Club is an annual private conference of approximately 120–150 political leaders and experts from industry, finance, academia and the media.

Origin

  • The original conference was held at the Hotel de Bilderberg in Oosterbeek, Netherlands, from 29 to 31 May 1954. It was initiated by several people, including Polish politician-in-exile Józef Retinger, concerned about the growth of anti-Americanism in Western Europe, who proposed an international conference at which leaders from European countries and the United States would be brought together with the aim of promoting Atlanticism – better understanding between the cultures of the United States and Western Europe to foster cooperation on political, economic and defense issues.
  • Retinger approached Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands who agreed to promote the idea, together with former Belgian Prime Minister Paul Van Zeeland, and the head of Unilever at that time, Dutchman Paul Rijkens. Bernhard in turn contacted Walter Bedell Smith, then head of the CIA, who asked Eisenhower adviser Charles Douglas Jackson to deal with the suggestion. The guest list was to be drawn up by inviting two attendees from each nation, one of each to represent conservative and liberal points of view. Fifty delegates from 11 countries in Western Europe attended the first conference, along with 11 Americans.
  • The success of the meeting led the organizers to arrange an annual conference. A permanent steering committee was established with Retinger appointed as permanent secretary. As well as organizing the conference the steering committee also maintained a register of attendee names and contact details with the aim of creating an informal network of individuals who could call upon one another in a private capacity. Conferences were held in France, Germany, and Denmark over the following three years. In 1957 the first U.S. conference was held on St. Simons Island, Georgia, with $30,000 from the Ford Foundation. The foundation supplied further funding for the 1959 and 1963 conferences.

MP’s Discuss Bilderberg in the House of Commons

 

Organizational structure

Prince_Bernhard_1942

Prince Bernhard of Lippe-Biesterfeld in 1942

Meetings are organized by a steering committee with two members from each of approximately 18 nations. Official posts, in addition to a chairman, include an Honorary Secretary General. There is no such category in the group’s rules as a “member of the group”. The only category that exists is “member of the Steering Committee”. In addition to the committee, there also exists a separate advisory group, though membership overlaps.

Dutch economist Ernst van der Beugel became permanent secretary in 1960, upon Retinger’s death. Prince Bernhard continued to serve as the meeting’s chairman until 1976, the year of his involvement in the Lockheed affair. The position of Honorary American Secretary General has been held successively by Joseph E. Johnson of the Carnegie EndowmentWilliam Bundy of PrincetonTheodore L. Eliot, Jr., former U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan, and Casimir A. Yost of Georgetown University’s Institute for the Study of Diplomacy.

A 2008 press release from the “American Friends of Bilderberg” stated that “Bilderberg’s only activity is its annual Conference. At the meetings, no resolutions are proposed, no votes taken, and no policy statements issued” and noted that the names of attendees were available to the press. The Bilderberg group’s unofficial headquarters is in Leiden in the Netherlands.

According to the American Friends of Bilderberg, the 2008 agenda dealt “mainly with a nuclear free world, cyber terrorism, Africa, Russia, finance, protectionism, US-EU relations, Afghanistan and Pakistan, Islam and Iran”.

Chairmen of the Steering Committee

  • Prince Bernhard of Lippe-Biesterfeld (1954–1975)
  • Walter Scheel (1975–1977)
  • Alec Douglas-Home (1977–1980)
  • Eric Roll, Baron Roll of Ipsden (1986–1989)
  • Peter Carington, 6th Baron Carrington (1990–1998)
  • Étienne Davignon (1998–2001)
  • Henri de Castries (since 2001)

 Mark Anderson, received the gavel from Tucker to cover Bilderberg. Mark will explain his coverage and knowledge of Bilderberg, show why citizens should care about this group, and explain what the group’s apparent function is in determining the world’s future.

 

Participants

Main article: List of Bilderberg participants

Historically, attendee lists have been weighted towards bankers, politicians, and directors of large businesses.

Heads of state, including King Juan Carlos I of Spain and Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, have attended meetings. Prominent politicians from North America and Europe are past attendees. In past years, board members from many large publicly traded corporations have attended, including IBM, Xerox, Royal Dutch Shell, Nokia and Daimler.

The 2009 meeting participants in Greece included Greek prime minister Kostas Karamanlis, Finnish prime minister Matti Vanhanen, Swedish foreign minister Carl Bildt, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg, U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner, World Bank president Robert Zoellick, President of the European Commission José Manuel Barroso, Queen Sofia of Spain, and Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands.

In 2009 the group hosted a dinner meeting at the Château of Val-Duchesse in Brussels on 12 November to promote the candidacy of Herman Van Rompuy for President of the European Council.

In 2013, a source involved in the planning for the group’s meeting that year in Watford, UK, was reported to have said that people whose names are not publicly issued may sometimes turn up “just for the day”.

 

Recent meetings

club_bilderbergMain article: List of Bilderberg meetings

  • 2014 (29 May – 3 June) at the Marriott hotel in Copenhagen, Denmark
  • 2013 (8–9 June) at the Grove Hotel, Watford, United Kingdom
  • 2012 (31 May – 3 June) at Westfields Marriott hotel in Chantilly, Virginia, USA
  • 2011 (9–12 June) at the Suvretta House in St. Moritz, Switzerland
  • 2010 (3–7 June) at the Hotel Dolce in Sitges, Spain
  • 2009 (14–17 May) at the Astir Palace resort in Vouliagmeni, Greece
  • 2008 (5–8 June) at the Westfields Marriott in Chantilly, Virginia, USA
  • 2007 (31 May – 3 June) at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel in Şişli, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • 2006 (8–11 June) at the Brookstreet Hotel in Kanata, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  • 2005 (5–8 May) at the Dorint Sofitel Seehotel Überfahrt in Rottach-Egern, Germany

UKIP and European Parliament Member, Gerard Batten attended the Bilderberg 2013 protest and was interviewed about Tony Blair’s Bilderberg attendance and corruption. He also spoke about his discontent with the secrecy of Bilderberg, how he became interested in it, what is possibly spoke about in the meetings and his multiple attempts at getting some transparency from those who have attended.

 

Criticism

According to chairman Étienne Davignon, ‘A major attraction of Bilderberg group meetings is that they provide an opportunity for participants to speak and debate candidly and to find out what major figures really think, without the risk of off-the-cuff comments becoming fodder for controversy in the media.’ However, partly because of its working methods to ensure strict privacy, the Bilderberg Group has been criticised for its lack of transparency and accountability.Concerns about lobbying have also arisen. Due to its privacy, Bilderberg is also accused of conspiracies. This outlook has been popular on both extremes of the political spectrum, even if they disagree about the exact nature of the group’s intentions. Some on the left accuse the Bilderberg group of conspiring to impose capitalist domination, while some on the right have accused the group of conspiring to impose a world government and planned economy.

In 2001, Denis Healey, a Bilderberg group founder and, for 30 years, a steering committee member, said: “To say we were striving for a one-world government is exaggerated, but not wholly unfair. Those of us in Bilderberg felt we couldn’t go on forever fighting one another for nothing and killing people and rendering millions homeless. So we felt that a single community throughout the world would be a good thing.”

In 2005 Davignon discussed these accusations with the BBC: “It is unavoidable and it doesn’t matter. There will always be people who believe in conspiracies but things happen in a much more incoherent fashion… When people say this is a secret government of the world I say that if we were a secret government of the world we should be bloody ashamed of ourselves.”

In a 1994 report Right Woos Left, published by the Political Research Associates, investigative journalist Chip Berlet argued that right-wing populist conspiracy theories about the Bilderberg group date back as early as 1964 and can be found in Phyllis Schlafly’s self-published book A Choice, Not an Echo, which promoted a conspiracy theory in which the Republican Party was secretly controlled by elitist intellectuals dominated by members of the Bilderberg group, whose internationalist policies would pave the way for world communism. Paradoxically, in August 2010 former Cuban president Fidel Castro wrote a controversial article for the Cuban Communist Party newspaper Granma in which he cited Daniel Estulin’s 2006 book The Secrets of the Bilderberg Club, which, as quoted by Castro, describes “sinister cliques and the Bilderberg lobbyists” manipulating the public “to install a world government that knows no borders and is not accountable to anyone but its own self”.

Proponents of Bilderberg conspiracy theories in the United States include individuals and groups such as the John Birch Society, political activist Phyllis Schlafly, writer Jim Tucker,political activist Lyndon LaRouche, radio host Alex Jones, and politician Jesse Ventura, who made the Bilderberg group a topic of a 2009 episode of his TruTV series Conspiracy Theory with Jesse VenturaNon-American proponents include Russian-Canadian writer Daniel Estulin

 

For more live coverage of Bilderberg 2013 in Watford England follow http://twitter.com/lukewearechange

 

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *