“Never Doubt that a small group of thoughtful citizens can change the world.”
“We’ve got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.” Timothy Wirth. President of the UN Foundation.
It doesn’t matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is true.” Paul Watson, co-founder of Greenpeace.
“The models are a convenient fiction that provide something very useful.” Dr. David Frame Climate Modeller. Oxford University.
“The Science is Settled” Obama. Forget the mountains of documents from the world’s leading advocacy centre and hundreds of emails leaked from East Anglia University computer system, the White House is clinging on to “The Science is Settled.” The invention of ‘Global Warming’ has been used to vilify anyone who dared to doubt the fabricated figures. Extraordinary pressure is still being applied to overwhelm any opposition to the ‘official’ story. It is hardly surprising that politicians and people alike are scared of AGW and have no idea that the majority of information is merely deliberate disinformation.
In Britain, the Government’s own figures set the cost of a ‘Climate Change Bill’ at £18 billion a year until 2050.
It did cross my mind that it may be quite difficult to find information from top scientists on the internet about the real science of AGW, ‘Anthropogenic Global Warming,’ (global warming caused by man.) Despite at least 32,000 scientists having signed a petition declaring that CO2 is not the reason for global warming, I did wonder if finding actual information would be difficult. The opposite is true. Most scientists, meteorologists and weather men, against all odds, including a deliberate lack of government funding, are doing a heroic job of reporting the facts. How annoying that I was inadvertently affected by the spin promoted in the press and media.
After dipping into many scientific documents on the subject of current global temperatures, I happened to read a particular blog. Bad language and nasty comments flowed from ‘believers’ in AGW where a bitter argument was taking place as I viewed. One comment caught my attention, it said, “Anyone that has studied the Communist manifesto understands what is going on. They use any means to achieve their goal of worldwide Communism, atheism and the slavery of all… Find the answers and understand the science which illustrates the truth about ‘Global Warming’ and you can dispense with all these useless comments, just go to..
Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide
ARTHUR B. ROBINSON, NOAH E. ROBINSON, AND WILLIE SOON
Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, 2251 Dick George Road, Cave Junction, Oregon 97523 [firstname.lastname@example.org]
That particular site with its great graphs and profusion of data and statistics, clearly illustrate that human anthropogenic global warming is not happening. There is probably as much information there as a non specialist can cope with. After you have read it there is a distinct possibility that you will not bother to return to this article. However there is still the question of who, why, when and what all the global warming pantomime is really about and at least part of the reason for such a massive charade will be uncovered. (Willie Soon, is a top class scientist, he is funded by industry, but insists that his research is absolutely faithful to science. The scientists promoting AGW are also sponsored by industry via taxes taken by government and distributed to those who will provide the results for their sponsor’s agenda.)
Many other sites offer great presentations and revelations, all directly dismissing the myth of the officially forecasted doom and devastation promoted by the manipulators of the world and the IPPC. (International Panel on Climate Change)
Lord Christopher Monckton, Third Viscount of Brenchley, is chief advisor to the Science and Public Policy Institute. As special advisor to the government, 1982 to 1986, he recommended that government needed to investigate ‘global warming’. He has been personally investigating it ever since. In Nov. 2006 his two articles on global warming in the Sunday Telegraph, crashed its websites after attracting 127,000 hits within two hours of publication.
While at the 9th annual conference on climate change in Las Vegas Dan Dicks of Press For Truth spoke with Lord Christopher Monckton about climate change and how the UN is using it to pave the way for a one world government and a new world order.
In 2009, in Minnesota, he drew attention to a draft plan by the UN to establish an unelected world government. Apparently some 5 million people have now watched the presentation.
Mr Monckton has travelled around the globe giving speeches, he has testified before the US Congress, spoken at UN conferences, lectured at Cambridge and triumphed in debate at Oxford.
His book ‘The Real Global Warming Disaster’ revealed some of the ‘scams’ that show shameless examples of manipulation of records. Monkton has reported Steven Goddard’s discovery of the results that have been ‘fabricated’ by adding data from computer models to give the impression of additional warming.
Christopher Monckton really is a great speaker. Do take a break and sit and enjoy listening to the informative, amazing and amusing speech he gave in the US.
Discover what Patrick Moore is up to. Patrick Moore resigned from Greenpeace in 1986, accusing the organization of political activism and unscientific perspectives. He says that global warming was not an issue when he left, but it certainly is now. “The fact that we had both higher temperatures and an ice age at a time when CO2 emissions were 10 times higher than they are today fundamentally contradicts the ‘certainty’ that human-caused CO2 emissions are the main cause of global warming.”
Jo Bastardi is a very famous weather forecaster and Meteorologist in the US. He is recognised as the most accurate in the business. His speech at the Heartland Conference in 2014 covers the amazing array of the inaccuracies and falsification created to attempt to portray the misconception of Global Warming. He is a bit of a comedian but in that field definitely cannot compete with Monckton. Other speakers at the Heartland Conference include Patrick Moore, Co founder of Greenpeace, Walter Cunningham, NASA astronaut, retired, Dr. Sebastian Luning, Dr. Madav Khandekar, Kenneth Haapala, and Dr. Roy Spencer, University of Alabama.
An interesting lecture delivered by ‘Woodrow Voluntartst’ can be viewed on you tube. He says that all the conspiracy things you have ever heard about a one world government, about the UN takeover of the world have now been laid to rest. Nothing is conspiratorial about it. It is all now published. The UN funded commission on international government… released their final report entitled ‘Our Global Neighbourhood.’ They are planning to create a world standing army under the day to day command of the UN Secretary General, and they recommend the creation of a new Economic Security Council into which the World Bank, the International money from all developmental programs and the World Trade Organization are to be consolidated.
Along the way there is sure to be an abundance of information that you will inevitably access.
Before we really get to grips with the daunting task of what the myth of Global Warming is really all about, forgive me for introducing you to a name from my long distant past, i.e. Margaret Mead. In those days, no student ever passed an exam on education without having read, ‘Coming of age in Samoa,’ by Margaret Mead. A decade after having to study Mead, while I was working in Saudi Arabia, the wife of the American Consul General in Dhahran, a Mrs. Bushnell, originally from Samoa, described to me how she and a group a strictly ‘Catholic’ teenagers, invented the entire story that they gave to Margaret Mead. All this has now been well established, even though the internet still has masses of stuff in praise of that work. The ‘girls’ believed that they had really fooled her, so did I. Now I wonder if she knew and it was always a scam and that perhaps she was even then, at the beginning of her career, an ultimate deceiver.
Why mention Mead? When trying to understand when and how the global warming scan came about, it is worth trying to find out where it really and officially began.
The preposterous claim that man made CO2 will barbecue the earth appears to have come out of a 1975 conference organized by the influential anthropologist, Margaret Mead, the then president of the AAAS, (American Association for the Advancement of Science) “This is where the global warming hoax was born.” (Marjorie Mazel Hecht.) What was it really all about?
David Sewell in an article written in the Spectator Magazine on “How Eugenics Poisoned the Welfare State,” describes the mind set of people like Mead, and her third husband Bateson, and their mad mission to redirect the reproduction of the human race.
Sewell explains how the plight of the poor and their children, came to be viewed. The original ‘Royal Commission on the Poor Laws’ and the elitist ‘Fabian Society,’ supporters of eugenics, believed that behaviour traits were inherited. The eugenicists aimed to replace natural selection with a planned and deliberate selection. Eugenics was the brainchild of Francis Dalton, cousin of Charles Darwin.
A national panic was created; Sewell says it “…became as salient as fears of Global Warming are today.” He quotes Bernard Shaw, “the only fundamental and possible Socialism was the socialization of the selective breeding of man.” The link between eugenics and Global Warming began at that particular conference in the US, organised by Margaret Mead.
Margaret Mead started talking about climate change in 1970. She warned that the planet was cooling; by the time of the 1975 conference she realized that Global Warming suited ‘the cause’ much better. The necessity to reduce the population of the world was her prime objective and the agenda would be best served by ‘warming’ and not ‘cooling.’ “The unadorned truth is that we do not need now, and will not need later, much of the marginal labour—the very young, the very old, the very uneducated, and the very stupid.” Mead.
“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world.” This quotation is well known enough, how fitting that the words are actually Meads and that it reflects her remorseless attitude, arrogant intellect and ruthless conclusions. We were warned.
“Global Warming’ is, and always was, a policy for genocidal reduction of the world’s population. The preposterous claim that human produced carbon dioxide ‘will broil the earth, melt the ice caps, and destroy human life,’ came out of the 1975 conference organized by Mead, president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.” ‘David Sewell.
The 1975 conference pivoted on the preposterous theme of either ‘feeding the people’ or ‘saving the environment’ .Were Margaret Mead and the others even then working for those who commissioned the ‘Report from Iron Mountain.’
At that very conference Mead achieved the lifetime loyalty of several young men in the audience. Whether they were already followers of her eugenics ideas or new recruits I do not know. They were Steven Schneider, George Woodwell and John Holdren. They took on the task of generating and fostering the Malthusian agenda. How many others were involved from the beginning I do not know, but it was at this conference that all the scare stories started, and where today’s climate hoax is firmly rooted.
Steven. Schneider, (1945 – 2010) was a lecturer at Stanford University he wrote, ‘Are we Entering the Greenhouse Century?’) He promoted the myth of global warming and remained faithful to Meads ideas to the end.
George Woodwell, called ‘the population-freak biologist.’ He is a member of the National Academy of Sciences and the Academy of Arts and Sciences and a global warming fanatic. He abhors human beings and is prepared to bend the truth. He has a sizable following of students based at Woods Hole Research Centre where John Holdren is a director.
He teaches his students that anyone who points out any of the errors in AGW, is simply uneducated. Woodwells says“…this is not the time to tie ourselves in knots over alleged errors…it is a clear statement of what is required for government to do its job, protecting the public welfare.” This is the policy of the man who lied in court and whose extravagantly crooked research got DDT banned. J. Gordon Edwards says that DDT saved more human lives than any other chemical in history. “DDT was banned by order of one man, Woodwell, His calculation of DDT in the soil was made by taking his sample from the spot where DDT spray trucks washed down! The worldwide effect on his fraudulent research has been millions of preventable deaths.”J Gordon Edwards. Maybe Woodwells stands ahead of Mead in a personal quest to reduce the population!
Last but not least, take a look at the current AAAS president John Holdren, Obama’s science Czar. He carries Mead’s message all the way from 1975 to today. He wrote ‘Ecoscience’ in 1977, with Paul and Anne Ehrich. The book of 1002 pages stated in plain English their undisguised message. The following quotes come directly from it: “women could be forced to abort their pregnancies whether they wanted to or not. The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put in the nations drinking water or food. Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized…” Photo copies of the book and its thousand pages can be found:
Today his message remains the same; only the style has changed. The language is no longer plain. Gone are the days of say exactly what you mean; now he uses words whose meanings are concealed in a subtle satin shroud of deceit, pleasant sounds with hidden implications. He even softens ‘sustainable development’ into ‘sustainable well being’. He denies ever making the statements in his 1977 book; he simply blames the Ehrich’s! Make no mistake, John Holdren is the same man, and even looks pretty much the same after all these years.
Anyone who dares to doubt the fabricated figures is vilified. Extraordinary pressure is still being applied to overwhelm any opposition to the official story. People in general have become quite frightened of what they think they are doing to the planet.
Christopher Monkton’s graph shows that there has been no global warming from Sept. 1996 to January 2014,
Steven Goddard’s August 2014 map shows a 56% increase in sea ice since August 2012.
Michael Mann’s ‘hockey stick’ graph has been proved to be totally erroneous. The world is currently cooling, and Al Gore’s Anthropogenic Global Warming theory is at last getting a cold shoulder.
The more you read about Holdren the more you worry about his scientific competence. But don’t worry. “Holdren is only doing what he was appointed to do. “Tell the president what the president told him to tell him” Tommy Atkins.
“The data doesn’t matter. We’re not basing our recommendations on the data. Were basing them on the climate models.” Prof. Follard, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research.
“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis…” David Rockefeller
Keep a lookout for the lies, keep searching for the truth and keep behaving as responsibly as possibly in a world where disinformation wears the crown.