With the reaction of the French government to go to war, two days after the Friday 13th Paris attacks, one must immediately wonder how this is not suspicious, as how much investigation really occurred to truly identify the perpetrators of this horrific, yet questionable event?
Recently the name ISIS is heard in many discussions due to the stories of terrorism and bloodshed coming out of the Middle East. However many seem unaware to the concept of the name, its origin and meaning from history? Lets see if this same name exists anywhere else, hidden in plain sight.
Its then important to look also at the current extreme Islamic group called ISIS to learn more about its creation, especially who is really behind this new ‘Boogieman’ of terror.
There is nothing new in a government lying to their people to start a war. Indeed because most people prefer living in peace to bloody and horrific death in war, any government that desires to initiate a war usually lies to their people to create the illusion that support for the war is the only possible choice they can make.
As horrific as it was and with respect to those who lost their lives in this tragic incident, ever since the lies and cover up of 9-11, the skeptical awakened few will always question events like this for the ‘False Flag’ patterning that continuously seems to go unnoticed by the official accounts.
This article is intended to reveal some of the anomalies that were not mentioned or with very limited details, which could present this story in a completely different light.
Immediately the Western media reported that supposed evidence showed it was Ukraine separatists backed by the Russian government ignoring certain evidence that would suggest this theory to be both contradictory and dubious, yet the same rhetoric is still ongoing in UK and USA media.
Two hundred and thirty nine people disappeared into thin air as the air traffic control radar signal vanished, leaving no trace of Flight MH 370, no plane debris or any sign of passengers. The world was stunned as the media came up with all kinds of possibilities as to what might have happened, but still to this day nothing has given the authorities a single clue as to what happened, or so we are told.
The world was led to believe by US media and government authorities that a ‘mass shooting’ was carried out by yet another deranged lone gunman, only after reports had initially stated there was a second shooter on several CBS and ABC affiliates. This latter-day Oswald is named Adam Lanza, who had no real motive, an aversion to shooting (so we were told at the time), and no one had actually seen in 3-4 years – and a gunman who is believed by some to have a different identity.
The ‘official story’ of July 7th 2005 is that 52 were killed and 700 were injured when almost simultaneous explosions ripped through three London Underground trains before, just under an hour later, a fourth explosion occurred on a number 30 bus that had been diverted from its normal route.
Initial reports from the train operating companies suggested that the explosions and devastation on the Underground were the result of train collisions, electrical failures and power surges. Shortly after the apparent explosion of a number 30 bus, at 947am outside the British Medical Association headquarters in Tavistock Square, a very different version of events began to unfold.
The first story to emerge was of up to six explosions on the underground with the timings staggered over the space of an hour. The times of the underground explosions were initially reported as being 8.51, 8.56 and 9.17.
Morning radio and television news soon began to fill with news of an incident on the underground in the Liverpool Street area.
Ever since the moment of the first impact at the World Trade Center, a struggle has raged between two broad, competing ideas of what really happened on September 11th, 2001.
Even as the administration exploited this official story (or “Official Conspiracy Theory”) as the pretext to launch new wars long in the making, independent researchers began to accumulate a vast body of evidence suggesting a different narrative for 9/11: that of the False Flag Operation.
The circumstances surrounding the assassination of John F Kennedy on November 22, 1963, spawned suspicions of a conspiracy.
These suspicions were mitigated somewhat when an official investigation by the Warren Commission concluded the following year that there was no conspiracy. Since then, doubts have arisen regarding the Commission’s controversial finding that only Lee Harvey Oswald was responsible for the assassination of Kennedy, and many Americans believe that others besides Oswald were also involved in the assassination. Critics have argued that the Commission and the government have covered up crucial information pointing to a conspiracy.